Immigrants from Switzerland vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,269,964 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.77%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Switzerland	Romanian
Minimum	6.1%	4.0%
Maximum	30.8%	70.0%
Range	24.7%	66.0%
Mean	15.7%	23.0%
Median	13.3%	16.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.8%	11.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.2%	28.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.3%	17.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.0%	19.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.8%	19.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland and Romanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are German (14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from North America (14.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Austrian (14.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Jordanians	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Northern Europeans	97.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	97.0 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| North America	96.6 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Germans	96.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| France	96.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.1 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
Basques	95.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
British	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| England	95.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.1%
Chileans	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	95.0 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Brazil	94.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 15.1%
Serbians	94.8 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 15.1%