Costa Rican vs Ethiopian Disability Age 18 to 34
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Ethiopian
Disability Age 18 to 34
Disability Age 18 to 34 Comparison
Costa Ricans
Ethiopians
6.3%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
92.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Ethiopian Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,342,292 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,075,890 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.58% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 22.6% |
| Range | 18.6% | 22.0% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Ethiopians by Disability Age 18 to 34
In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Morocco (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Croatia (6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Sri Lankan (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Bhutanese (6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Brazil (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 18 to 34 |
| Bhutanese | 96.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Ethiopians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 95.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 95.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | France | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 94.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 94.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 94.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 93.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Chileans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.9 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Macedonians | 92.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 6.3% |