Hungarian vs Ethiopian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Ethiopian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
Ethiopians
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
55.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Ethiopian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,483,073 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,096,222 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.16%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 67.8% | 28.0% |
Range | 66.6% | 27.0% |
Mean | 17.3% | 10.6% |
Median | 10.1% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Ethiopians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Colombia (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Portugal (11.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |