Chippewa vs Mongolian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Mongolian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Mongolians
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Mongolian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,546,705 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 34.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 9.5% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.3% | 97.3% |
| Mean | 26.4% | 17.1% |
| Median | 23.6% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.2% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |