Cape Verdean vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Yugoslavian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Yugoslavians
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,527,352 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 20.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 26.2% |
| Range | 28.5% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 9.3% |
| Median | 11.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |