Cape Verdean vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Alaskan Athabascan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Alaskan Athabascans
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,527,352 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 72.7% |
| Range | 28.5% | 71.3% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 20.4% |
| Median | 11.6% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Alaskan Athabascans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |