Cape Verdean vs Central American Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Central American
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Central Americans
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Central American Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,527,352 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,856,624 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 0.75%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Central American |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 60.5% |
Range | 28.5% | 57.6% |
Mean | 12.7% | 15.9% |
Median | 11.6% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Central Americans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |