Albanian vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Albanian
Icelander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Albanians
Icelanders
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Albanian vs Icelander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,280,277 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,122,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 2.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Albanian | Icelander |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 30.0% |
Range | 20.8% | 26.2% |
Mean | 11.4% | 15.0% |
Median | 12.2% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Albanians and Icelanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.67%), Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.97%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |