Bulgarian vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Okinawan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Okinawans
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,945,490 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,394,168 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Okinawan |
Minimum | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 38.4% |
Range | 45.8% | 37.9% |
Mean | 12.7% | 11.1% |
Median | 11.4% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 15.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Okinawans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.92%), Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |