Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Hong Kong
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,424,226 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 4.8%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 0.44% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 15.8% |
Range | 49.6% | 14.5% |
Mean | 11.2% | 8.4% |
Median | 9.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Asian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Austria (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |