Basque vs Costa Rican Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Costa Rican
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Costa Ricans
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Costa Rican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Basque | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 35.4% | 45.8% |
| Range | 34.4% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 11.8% |
| Median | 12.2% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Costa Ricans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |