Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Costa Rican Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Costa Rican
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Costa Ricans
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
68.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Costa Rican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,053,699 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.58%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 55.9% | 45.8% |
| Range | 52.9% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 11.8% |
| Median | 13.5% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Costa Ricans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |