Basque vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Immigrants from Belarus
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Immigrants from Belarus
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,175,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Basque | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 35.4% | 41.3% |
| Range | 34.4% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 12.1% |
| Median | 12.2% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Immigrants from Belarus by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |