Bangladeshi vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Subsaharan African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Sub-Saharan Africans
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,594,140 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,393,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 23.2%, a difference of 4.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 60.3% |
| Range | 43.1% | 57.5% |
| Mean | 24.3% | 23.6% |
| Median | 22.9% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Sub-Saharan Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.020%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |