Bahamian vs Scotch-Irish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bahamian
Scotch-Irish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bahamians
Scotch-Irish
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Scotch-Irish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,412,919 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,697,572 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 46.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bahamian | Scotch-Irish |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.8% | 98.6% |
Mean | 8.9% | 14.9% |
Median | 6.8% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 17.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.29%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Latvia (4.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Iran (4.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from South Africa (4.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Icelander (4.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Cambodian (4.5%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.1 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Icelanders | 99.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |