Aleut vs Ute Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Ute
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Ute
15.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Ute Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,537,447 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.8%.
![Aleut vs Ute Single Male Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-male-poverty/aleuts-vs-ute-single-male-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Ute |
Minimum | 9.3% | 11.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.7% | 88.2% |
Mean | 31.5% | 45.2% |
Median | 18.0% | 37.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.7% | 62.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.2% | 42.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.2% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.5% | 30.4% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Ute by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Alaska Native (15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Alsatian (15.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dominican (15.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.8% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |