Pima vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Pima
Chickasaw
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 46.4% | 54.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.6% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 79.8% | 80.6% |
| Median | 81.6% | 79.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.6% | 73.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 85.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |