Cypriot vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Cypriot
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Cypriots
Chickasaw
85.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,842,165 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 85.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cypriot | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 51.9% | 54.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.1% | 45.4% |
Mean | 84.2% | 80.6% |
Median | 86.7% | 79.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 81.4% | 73.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 89.6% | 85.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Cypriots by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Paraguayan (85.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (85.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (85.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Serbian (85.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |