Pima vs Chickasaw Disability Age 65 to 74

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics

COMPARE

Pima

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German PeruvianPimaPolish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Chickasaw

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee CheyenneChickasawChilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Disability Age 65 to 74

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64Disability Age 65 to 74Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison

Pima

Chickasaw

Tragic

38.6%

DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74

0.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

347th/ 347

METRIC RANK

30.2%

DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74

0.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

331st/ 347

METRIC RANK

Pima vs Chickasaw Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,525,025 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,556,011 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 27.8%.

Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Pima	Chickasaw
Minimum	19.4%	13.6%
Maximum	100.0%	80.0%
Range	80.6%	66.4%
Mean	49.6%	41.7%
Median	40.6%	38.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	28.5%	33.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	70.6%	48.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	42.1%	14.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	27.1%	13.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	26.6%	13.3%

Demographics Similar to Pima and Chickasaw by Disability Age 65 to 74

In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (37.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Tohono O'odham (36.0%, a difference of 7.1%), Inupiat (34.5%, a difference of 11.8%), Navajo (33.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Creek (30.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Choctaw (30.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Native/Alaskan (30.4%, a difference of 0.62%), Hopi (30.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and Colville (30.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 65 to 74
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 30.0%
Choctaw	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 30.2%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 30.2%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.2%
Natives/Alaskans	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.4%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Alaska Natives	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.6%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 31.1%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 31.5%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 32.3%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 32.4%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 32.6%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 32.7%
Tsimshian	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 32.9%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 33.1%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 33.3%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 34.5%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 36.0%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 37.8%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 38.6%