Pima vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Pima
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Pima
Chickasaw
69.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,696 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 69.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,683,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 74.5%, a difference of 7.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 17.1% | 44.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.9% | 55.9% |
| Mean | 70.2% | 73.9% |
| Median | 75.2% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.6% | 65.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.2% | 83.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.6% | 17.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.4% | 13.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (68.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (69.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Guyana (69.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Menominee (68.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and Tohono O'odham (68.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 70.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 70.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 70.3% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 70.0% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 69.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 69.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 69.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 69.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 68.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 68.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 68.6% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 68.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 68.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 67.2% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 66.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Norway (74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Peru (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from India (74.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chilean (74.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 13.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 74.5% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 12.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 74.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 12.7 /100 | #216 | Poor 74.5% |
| Chileans | 12.5 /100 | #217 | Poor 74.5% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 74.5% |
| Nepalese | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 74.5% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 10.3 /100 | #220 | Poor 74.5% |
| Chickasaw | 10.3 /100 | #221 | Poor 74.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 9.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 74.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 7.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 74.4% |
| Seminole | 6.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 5.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 5.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 74.2% |