Pima vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Pima
Chickasaw
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Pima
Chickasaw
28.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.5%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,293,742 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,361,358 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022 and weighted average of 24.5%, a difference of 16.1%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 57.4% |
| Range | 92.0% | 54.1% |
| Mean | 41.5% | 26.8% |
| Median | 34.9% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.5% | 32.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 37.0% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.5% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 10.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Pima by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Sioux (28.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Hopi (28.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Cheyenne (28.1%, a difference of 0.94%), Colville (29.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Kiowa (29.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 28.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (24.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch West Indian (24.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Alsatian (24.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Congo (24.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Black/African American (24.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 25.2% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 25.3% |