Kiowa vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Kiowa
 Zimbabwean
 In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Kiowa
Zimbabweans
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
86.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,396 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 79.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,188,231 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449 and weighted average of 86.1%, a difference of 8.7%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Zimbabwean | 
| Minimum | 45.5% | 79.4% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 54.5% | 20.6% | 
| Mean | 76.0% | 88.7% | 
| Median | 76.4% | 87.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.7% | 85.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.0% | 92.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 7.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 5.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 5.0% | 
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Native/Alaskan (78.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.0%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 79.7%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 79.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 79.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 79.0%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 78.9%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 78.1%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 77.9%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 77.4%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 77.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 77.0%  | 
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (86.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (86.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bolivia (86.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (85.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #1  | Exceptional 86.4%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2  | Exceptional 86.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 86.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 86.2%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 86.1%  | 
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 86.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 86.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 85.9%  | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 85.9%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 100.0 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 85.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 85.8%  | 
| Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 85.7%  | 
| Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 85.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 85.6%  | 
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 85.6%  |