Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,764,939 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of $54,958, a difference of 2.3%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are West Indian ($54,936, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from West Indies ($54,927, a difference of 0.060%), Comanche ($54,922, a difference of 0.070%), Bangladeshi ($54,719, a difference of 0.44%), and French American Indian ($54,699, a difference of 0.47%).