Subsaharan African vs Celtic Average Family Size
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Celtic
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Celtics
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.11
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,346 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174 and weighted average of 3.25. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,519 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.320 and weighted average of 3.11, a difference of 4.4%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Celtic |
| Minimum | 1.39 | 1.91 |
| Maximum | 4.61 | 4.09 |
| Range | 3.22 | 2.18 |
| Mean | 3.30 | 3.01 |
| Median | 3.29 | 3.05 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.21 | 2.91 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.44 | 3.15 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.54 | 0.37 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.54 | 0.37 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (3.25, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Bhutanese | 81.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Tsimshian | 80.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Armenians | 78.2 /100 | #145 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Africa | 77.9 /100 | #146 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 75.7 /100 | #147 | Good 3.24 |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are English (3.11, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (3.11, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (3.11, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch (3.11, a difference of 0.10%), and Czech (3.11, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Italians | 0.1 /100 | #317 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Eastern Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #318 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Welsh | 0.1 /100 | #319 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Immigrants | North America | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 3.11 |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 3.11 |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 3.11 |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 3.11 |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.11 |
| Czechs | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.11 |
| Belgians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.11 |
| Latvians | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.11 |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.11 |