Subsaharan African vs South American Indian Average Family Size
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
 South American Indian
 Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
South American Indians
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.26
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs South American Indian Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,346 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174 and weighted average of 3.25. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,094 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.352 and weighted average of 3.26, a difference of 0.41%.
 
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | South American Indian | 
| Minimum | 1.39 | 2.39 | 
| Maximum | 4.61 | 3.79 | 
| Range | 3.22 | 1.40 | 
| Mean | 3.30 | 3.16 | 
| Median | 3.29 | 3.26 | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.21 | 2.88 | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.44 | 3.35 | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.23 | 0.47 | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.54 | 0.32 | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.54 | 0.32 | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and South American Indians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (3.25, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Cuba (3.26, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.27, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (3.26, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Syria (3.26, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Colombia (3.27, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 92.8 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 3.27  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 92.4 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 3.27  | 
| South American Indians | 91.6 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 3.26  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 91.3 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 3.26  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.7 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 3.26  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 90.6 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 3.26  | 
| Colombians | 89.9 /100 | #128  | Excellent 3.26  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 88.6 /100 | #129  | Excellent 3.26  | 
| Laotians | 88.5 /100 | #130  | Excellent 3.26  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 87.7 /100 | #131  | Excellent 3.26  | 
| Costa Ricans | 86.8 /100 | #132  | Excellent 3.26  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133  | Excellent 3.26  | 
| Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141  | Excellent 3.25  | 
| Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142  | Excellent 3.25  |