Malaysian vs Central American Family Households
COMPARE
Malaysian
Central American
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Malaysians
Central Americans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Central American Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,012,303 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,084,166 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Central American |
| Minimum | 27.8% | 55.3% |
| Maximum | 93.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 65.8% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 70.2% |
| Median | 65.9% | 69.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.5% | 72.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Central Americans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.040%), South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |