Burmese vs Central American Family Households
COMPARE
Burmese
Central American
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Burmese
Central Americans
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Central American Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,084,166 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.39%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Central American |
| Minimum | 35.2% | 55.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.8% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 70.5% | 70.2% |
| Median | 70.3% | 69.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 72.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Central Americans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.040%), South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |