Malaysian vs Navajo Family Households
COMPARE
Malaysian
Navajo
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Malaysians
Navajo
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Navajo Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,012,303 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,752,458 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 66.4%, a difference of 0.76%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Navajo |
| Minimum | 27.8% | 28.6% |
| Maximum | 93.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 65.8% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 69.7% |
| Median | 65.9% | 69.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 64.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.5% | 75.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Navajo by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (66.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Colombia (66.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |