Malaysian vs Pennsylvania German Family Households
COMPARE
Malaysian
Pennsylvania German
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Malaysians
Pennsylvania Germans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Pennsylvania German Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,012,303 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,061,495 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 66.1%, a difference of 0.39%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Pennsylvania German |
| Minimum | 27.8% | 38.5% |
| Maximum | 93.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 65.8% | 61.5% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 75.3% |
| Median | 65.9% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 67.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.5% | 85.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Pennsylvania Germans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Hong Kong (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |