Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Subsaharan African
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Luxembourgers
Sub-Saharan Africans
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,627,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126 and weighted average of 27.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 5.4% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 52.5% | 58.3% |
Range | 47.1% | 55.4% |
Mean | 25.5% | 29.4% |
Median | 26.1% | 28.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bulgarian (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (27.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (27.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Scottish (27.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 4.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 4.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 26.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 3.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 26.9% |
Moroccans | 3.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 26.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |