Liberian vs Cape Verdean Family Households
COMPARE
Liberian
Cape Verdean
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Liberians
Cape Verdeans
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Cape Verdean Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,040,608 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,550,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 61.8%, a difference of 0.31%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Cape Verdean |
Minimum | 40.9% | 45.5% |
Maximum | 89.4% | 88.4% |
Range | 48.5% | 42.9% |
Mean | 64.2% | 62.0% |
Median | 63.0% | 61.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.3% | 57.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.1% | 66.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Cape Verdeans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |