Liberian vs Chinese Family Households
COMPARE
Liberian
Chinese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Liberians
Chinese
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
68.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Chinese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,040,608 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 68.1%, a difference of 10.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Liberian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 40.9% | 47.5% |
| Maximum | 89.4% | 82.6% |
| Range | 48.5% | 35.1% |
| Mean | 64.2% | 68.6% |
| Median | 63.0% | 69.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.3% | 65.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.1% | 73.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |