Subsaharan African vs Cape Verdean Family Households
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Cape Verdean
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Cape Verdeans
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Cape Verdean Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,550,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 61.8%, a difference of 0.44%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 32.6% | 45.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 88.4% |
| Range | 67.4% | 42.9% |
| Mean | 62.5% | 62.0% |
| Median | 61.7% | 61.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.0% | 57.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.6% | 66.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Cape Verdeans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |