Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Malaysian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Malaysian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Malaysians
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Malaysian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,012,303 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.010%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Malaysian |
Minimum | 42.3% | 27.8% |
Maximum | 85.6% | 93.6% |
Range | 43.4% | 65.8% |
Mean | 65.1% | 66.8% |
Median | 66.8% | 65.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.4% | 71.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Malaysians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |