Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sudan
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sudan
7.0%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,547,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,904,005 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.320 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 2.3%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 23.7% | 13.0% |
| Range | 22.8% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 6.3% |
| Median | 6.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (7.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Comanche (7.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Creek (7.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Micronesia (6.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Sudanese (6.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Thailand (6.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Paiute | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Kenyans | 2.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 2.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Creek | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 1.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Comanche | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Choctaw | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 7.1% |