Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Panama Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Panama
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Panama
7.0%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Panama Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,547,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,053,842 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.688 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Panama |
Minimum | 0.84% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 23.7% | 8.9% |
Range | 22.8% | 8.2% |
Mean | 7.2% | 5.5% |
Median | 6.9% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Panama by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (7.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Comanche (7.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Creek (7.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Kiowa (7.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (7.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Fijian (7.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Ecuadorian (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Cuban (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
Kenyans | 2.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 2.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 7.0% |
Creek | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish Americans | 1.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 7.0% |
Comanche | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 7.0% |
Choctaw | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 7.0% |
Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.0% |
Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |
Kiowa | 0.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 7.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 7.2% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ecuadorians | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 7.2% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 7.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 7.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 7.3% |