Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Bangladesh
7.0%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,547,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,439,882 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 23.7% | 17.0% |
| Range | 22.8% | 15.6% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Median | 6.9% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bangladesh by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (7.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Comanche (7.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Creek (7.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Micronesia (6.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants (6.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Paiute | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Kenyans | 2.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 2.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Creek | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 1.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Comanche | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Choctaw | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |