Celtic vs Cuban Family Households
COMPARE
Celtic
 Cuban
 Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Celtics
Cubans
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Cuban Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,974,040 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 67.7%, a difference of 6.2%.
 
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Cuban | 
| Minimum | 38.1% | 46.6% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 61.9% | 53.4% | 
| Mean | 67.4% | 70.2% | 
| Median | 65.8% | 70.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 64.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 76.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 12.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 9.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 9.0% | 
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households | 
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207  | Poor 63.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208  | Poor 63.9%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209  | Poor 63.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210  | Tragic 63.8%  | 
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211  | Tragic 63.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212  | Tragic 63.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213  | Tragic 63.8%  | 
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214  | Tragic 63.8%  | 
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215  | Tragic 63.8%  | 
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216  | Tragic 63.8%  | 
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217  | Tragic 63.7%  | 
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218  | Tragic 63.7%  | 
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219  | Tragic 63.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220  | Tragic 63.7%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221  | Tragic 63.7%  | 
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Sri Lankan (67.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (67.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Pakistan (67.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (67.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (67.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 68.2%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 68.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 68.2%  | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 68.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 68.0%  | 
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 67.9%  | 
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 67.8%  | 
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 67.7%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 67.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 67.7%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 67.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 67.5%  | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 67.4%  | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 67.4%  | 
| Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 67.4%  |