Celtic vs Osage Family Households
COMPARE
Celtic
Osage
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Celtics
Osage
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Osage Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Osage |
| Minimum | 38.1% | 49.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 77.6% |
| Range | 61.9% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 67.4% | 64.8% |
| Median | 65.8% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 61.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 68.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Osage by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |