Celtic vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Family Households
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Northern Europe
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,950,650 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.040%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
Minimum | 38.1% | 27.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.9% | 72.9% |
Mean | 67.4% | 65.2% |
Median | 65.8% | 65.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 59.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 75.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Northern Europe by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |