Celtic vs Immigrants from Canada Family Households
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Canada
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Canada
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
19.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Canada Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,128,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 0.34%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Canada |
Minimum | 38.1% | 37.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.9% | 62.5% |
Mean | 67.4% | 65.7% |
Median | 65.8% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 54.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 73.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 19.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Canada by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Thailand (63.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |