Burmese vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Afghanistan
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.18%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Afghanistan |
| Minimum | 35.2% | 42.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 85.6% |
| Range | 64.8% | 43.4% |
| Mean | 70.5% | 65.1% |
| Median | 70.3% | 66.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 70.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Afghanistan by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |