Burmese vs Yaqui Family Households
COMPARE
Burmese
Yaqui
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Burmese
Yaqui
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Yaqui Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,720,236 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yaqui and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.18%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Yaqui |
Minimum | 35.2% | 41.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 84.2% |
Range | 64.8% | 42.3% |
Mean | 70.5% | 67.4% |
Median | 70.3% | 67.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 62.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 73.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Yaqui by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yaqui are Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |