Burmese vs Laotian Family Households
COMPARE
Burmese
Laotian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Burmese
Laotians
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Laotian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,743,344 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129 and weighted average of 65.8%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Laotian |
| Minimum | 35.2% | 54.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 96.9% |
| Range | 64.8% | 42.1% |
| Mean | 70.5% | 71.8% |
| Median | 70.3% | 69.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 78.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Laotians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |