Burmese vs Central American 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Burmese
Central American
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Burmese
Central Americans
57.8%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
54.7%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
23.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Central American 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,950,170 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 57.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,126,351 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Central American |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 27.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 85.0% |
| Range | 94.1% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 60.1% | 54.4% |
| Median | 62.0% | 54.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.5% | 48.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.7% | 59.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Burmese by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Slavic (57.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (57.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Filipino (57.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Shoshone (57.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Ottawa (57.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 57.9% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 99.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 57.9% |
| Pakistanis | 99.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 57.9% |
| Shoshone | 99.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 57.9% |
| Ottawa | 99.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 57.9% |
| Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 57.8% |
| Hmong | 98.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 57.8% |
| Burmese | 98.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 57.8% |
| Slavs | 98.8 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 57.8% |
| Palestinians | 98.6 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 57.7% |
| Cajuns | 98.5 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 57.7% |
| Fijians | 98.4 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 57.6% |
| Lebanese | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 57.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.2 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 57.6% |
| Jordanians | 98.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 57.6% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Japan (54.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Iroquois (54.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Romania (54.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants (54.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Russian (54.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 33.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 55.0% |
| Marshallese | 30.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 54.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 27.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 54.8% |
| Russians | 26.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 54.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 25.0 /100 | #191 | Fair 54.7% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 54.7% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 54.7% |
| Central Americans | 23.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 54.7% |
| Iroquois | 22.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 54.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 19.3 /100 | #196 | Poor 54.6% |
| Argentineans | 17.5 /100 | #197 | Poor 54.5% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 16.2 /100 | #198 | Poor 54.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 15.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 54.4% |
| Houma | 15.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 54.4% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 54.4% |