Immigrants from Kenya vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kenya
Sri Lankan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kenya
Sri Lankans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kenya vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,040,031 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.39%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kenya | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 8.1% | 29.8% |
| Range | 7.0% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 0.71% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kenya and Sri Lankans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |