Immigrants from Sudan vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Sri Lankan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Sri Lankans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,954,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.77%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 8.5% | 29.8% |
| Range | 7.5% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 4.0% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.71% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Sri Lankans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bahamian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |