Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.71%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 13.0% |
Range | 16.5% | 12.1% |
Mean | 5.5% | 5.2% |
Median | 5.2% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |