Filipino vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,292,295 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 10.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Range | 8.3% | 12.1% |
Mean | 4.5% | 5.2% |
Median | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |