Zimbabwean vs Native/Alaskan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Native/Alaskan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Natives/Alaskans
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Native/Alaskan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,715,386 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 39.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 17.3% | 18.5% |
| Range | 16.5% | 13.8% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 9.5% |
| Median | 5.2% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Black/African American (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (7.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Navajo (7.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Hopi (7.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and Pueblo (7.6%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |